- About the Initiative
- View Topical Index of Curriculum Units
- Search Curricular Resources
- View Volumes of Curriculum Units from National Seminars
- Find Curriculum Units Written in Seminars Led by Yale Faculty
- Find Curriculum Units Written by Teachers in National Seminars
- Browse Curriculum Units Developed in Teachers Institutes
- On Common Ground
- League of Institutes
- Video Programs
Have a suggestion to improve this page?
To leave a general comment about our Web site, please click here
Diyogi (the Navajo rug) has been within the Diné people for hundreds of years. Legends say Spider Woman taught the Diné woman the process of how to gather the tools for weaving, the procedure when preparing to weave, and the intricate designs of the rugs were created with prayers and songs. The first loom was said to be constructed of sky and earth strings, with weaving tools of sunlight, lightning, white shell, and crystal. The weaving tools were and are what the grandmothers say are our weapons of survival, because they clothe, feed, and sustain her family. This method had been taught from generations from the past, and today is taught to young Diné girls from their mothers, grandmothers and great-grandmothers.
The earliest evidence of a Diné loom found was found in Massacre Cave, and dates from the 1300’s. This proves our people have had early knowledge in using the number line concept. During the early 1600’s to 1700’s rug patterns were simple horizontal designs with basic geometric patterns. Natural colors from plants, silt soil, crushed schist, and the natural color of chiro sheep wool were used to create the colors of the yarn. These early rugs were used as saddle blankets, door coverings, clothing, hair ties, belts, bedrolls and the widely known chief blankets. From the late 1700’s to today, chemical dyes are used to create numerous vivid colors of intricate and complex designs within the rugs. Today these rugs are mainly woven for promotion regalia during a graduation ceremony or for weddings. Currently Diné rugs are skillfully woven with designs of symbolic representation, and some words of names or clans, or with scenery of the land. There is much more to be known about the Navajo rug and I will elaborate more of the topic within my social studies time.
My curriculum unit is designed to teach students to learn to use the number line while learning fractions. The concept “fractions” has many facets, and it is not just learning to add and subtract. It is learning how apply and use fractions in real world situations. I want to give my students an enduring understanding so they are able to apply their learning in other contexts. I want our students to have a solid foundation of the fractions process. They will to learn how to make connections while solving all facets of fractions, and will gain an in depth explanation and learning of the number line while designing a student generated Navajo rug. Most Diné families have Navajo rugs within their homes and have some knowledge about the Navajo rug, but not the historical, spiritual, utilization, expense and time for creating and weaving a rug.
My students are fifth grade Native American Indian (Diné/Navajo) English Language Learning students. Our students lack understanding of the Navajo rug and the fraction concept. They know enough to pass, but they need deeper knowledge as part of their learning continuum. Their state and district math assessments show that a majority of our students score at the 40%tile and below. As fifth grade students, they should know their basic facts of whole number operations: addition, subtraction, and multiplication and division facts. The knowledge of operations should help students to solve fraction problems, but in the real world of education this is not so in our classrooms. Schools on the Reservation still use a scripted text book as their core curriculum.
The web of fraction knowledge has many strands, including unit fractions, general fractions, proper and improper fractions and mixed numbers, equivalence or renaming, comparison, addition and subtraction, multiplication and division. These strands get all mixed together in teaching. Students need to learn the different interpretations so they have deep enduring understanding. Using concrete objects that students are familiar with will help them to learn the skills and feel confident in knowing fractions.
The web of fractions has structures (numerator and the denominator), have types of fractions (proper, improper, and mixed), use the operations, and the relationships of the fractions (fraction to fraction, fraction to decimals, fraction to percent, and equivalent). Along with the fraction components, students need to know how to use the different models to demonstrate fraction in representation. Visual diagrams, geometric shapes, and objects are used to exhibit the area model, the set model, and the linear measurement techniques.
Methods of Representing Fractions
It is recommended to use rectangles, squares, and triangles to depict fractions because Navajo looms and rugs correlate with these examples. Creating a visual representation of a fraction with a rectangle subdivided into the appropriate number of equal sections as the denominator, and with the number of shaded sections equal to the numerator is the area model representation.
The full first column of the first figure represents ¼. The second figure has 8 equal columns, and 2 of them are shaded, so it represents 2/8; also the columns are divided in three pieces, making 24 equal small rectangles, of which 6 are shaded, so the figure illustrates that 2/8 = 6/24. In the third figure, the shaded region is 9/32 of the whole. The shaded area can also be thought of as ¾ of the columns it occupies, and these columns are 3/8 of the whole rectangle, so the picture can be taken as illustrating the multiplication ¾ x 3/8 = 9/32.
The set model is a display of individual shapes, with a distinguished subset to match the fraction. Below, are weaving tools as a set model. There are 6 tools for weaving. The 2 spindles are 2/6 of the whole collection, and the weaving comb is 1/6 of the collection.
Usually manipulatives, diagrams of pictures, and real objects are used to show understanding. Set models have numerous uses, including comparing like and unlike fractions, adding, subtracting, equivalent fractions, simplifying fractions, and more. Using weaving tools for the loom to demonstrate objects will help students visualize the patterns of fractions. These tools include weaving combs, baton, and sieve, skeins of wool of different colors, patterns of different rugs, and others. Students are able to sketch and orally explain, then write the set model created.
In teaching fractions, it is important to have students become mindful of the quantity that represents the whole, or unit. A fraction, or any number, expresses the size of a quantity in relation to a unit. In the area model, the unit is usually understood to be the whole rectangle. In a set model, the unit is usually understood to be the whole set. But in some situations, the unit may be chosen differently. It is essential to have students always specify the unit to which a fraction refers, until it becomes an automatic process.1
The linear measurement model is a concrete version of the number line method. Linear measurement plays an important role in creating a Navajo loom and rug. The number line is created to indicate numbered markings as unit segments on a line. For example the distance from 0 to 1 is known as a unit segment and additional units of whole numbers are marked at the same distance, consecutively. My students will create a loom from a piece of cardboard that has lines marked consecutively by short cuts, horizontally at the bottom of the cardboard. The distance between these short cuts is the warp width which is the anchor for the string. The stripe patterns created vertically are the fractional parts of the whole rug, known as the weft. These fraction components are also marked along a line resembling a number line.
The warp is cut into sections of ⅛ of an inch marked horizontally on each end of the cardboard. These marks will correspond to the unit segments on a number line. The warp cuts are for the threads stretched lengthwise. The wefts are the strings woven between and through the warp strands. The weft determines the vertical patterns of the striped rug and will establish the fraction part to a whole.
The Number Line
The number line can be thought of as an ideal ruler. It is a natural tool to use in weaving, or in any activity involving length measurement. Other tools for length measurement, especially for showing fractions of a unit length, are fraction strips and fraction bars. Cuisenaire rods can also be used to teach about length, especially the addition of lengths. When using the number line, it is not necessary to show the whole line, and in particular, the zero or origin does not need to be displayed. However, it is important for students to understand the Measurement Principle:
The number that labels a point on the number line tells the distance of the point from the origin, as a multiple of the unit length.
The distance between any two points labeled by consecutive whole numbers is always equal to the unit length.2
The features of a line are the order, distance, and length. These features are used to introduce a unit length/bar, and compare other lengths to multiples of the unit.3 To form a number line, first choose an origin (“0”), then choose a unit interval, (the other end from 0 is “1”), and lay off unit intervals moving to the right (i.e. + direction).4 Once a unit segment has been chosen on a given straight line, the places of all the whole numbers are fixed on the line. 5 In fact, all numbers are assigned to points. However, it is takes more work to determine where other numbers should go.
My goal is to teach fractions using the number line and the Navajo loom and rug. The loom and rug are mediums to math, and to Diné culture and language. The enduring understanding of learning the processes of fraction when creating or using a medium is what students will be able to apply into other content or another grade level. The objectives of my curriculum is to add and subtract fractions, equivalent fractions, multiply and divide fractions, convert measurement units (a small rug to a larger rug), while using the number line, so students have a solid understanding of fractions when given different forms of fraction.
Add and Subtract Fractions and the number line
Like fractions are fractions with common denominator and you are able to add and subtract the numerator then rewrite the same denominator. Then the thinking part is working with fractions with unlike denominators. When working with unlike dominators, the least common denominator is attained when multiplying the number and the denominator by the same factor to make an equivalent fraction. The diagrams below are examples of unlike fraction using area model and a number to model how fractions are equivalent. Students will use this method when using Navajo rugs with stripes.
Area model of addition
Question: If ⅜ of a rug consists of black stripes, and 2/4 of the rug consists of green stripes, what fraction of the rug is either black or green?
Convert Measurement Units
There is a lot of technology programs used to scale objects. My students will learn how to scale components of a small rug into a larger rug. They will look at size, which tells something about an object’s dimensions in relation to other things. Most cultures have an established system of measurement to have a clear dimension of objects. The height of a horse is so many hands high, this make a mental comparison for the given object and the measurement. Once the object is measured, we can scale the size. Scale means size in relation to some unit of measurement that is larger or smaller. For example, when drawing a ¼ scale and I want to change the scale so ¼ inch equals 1 foot, then we are relating two sets of measurements. The challenge is moving between scales to understand the difference between the scaling of something in “linear measurements” versus “area measurements.”6 We would only need the dimensions of the original small rug and to scale up to a larger frame as a surface measurement. This refers to proportion to the ratio between the parts of the small rug as a whole surface. The grid is a system of fixed horizontal and vertical divisions.7 Anything, no matter how complicated or irregularly shaped, can be conceived of in terms of X (horizontal) and Y (vertical) axes.8 When changing the scaling size the X and Y coordinates need to be measured in appropriate proportions. The grid is a compatible tool students will use to scale up the small rug into a larger frame. Students will practice scaling as math measurement tool. It represents a real world problem solving strategy and a mathematical problem by graphing points to the coordinate plane, and interprets coordinate values of points in the context of their situation. It is a challenging activity, requiring analysis and hands on manipulation.
Approach to fractions
We will start our study of fractions with unit fractions. We will use basic fraction measurements which are ½, 1/3, ¼, 1/5, and so forth. For example, ½ of a whole is something it takes 2 of to make the whole. Since two pints is equivalent to a quart, a pint is ½ of a quart. Similarly, 1/3 of a whole is something that it takes 3 of to make the whole. So 4 inches is 1/3 of a foot, because 3 lengths of 4 inches make 12 inches, which is a foot. This is an example of a length model for fractions.
12 inches = 1 foot
Likewise, ¼ of a whole is something that it takes 4 equivalent parts to make a whole. So when we cut a square into halves both horizontally and vertically, then each of the small squares is ¼ of the whole square, since 4 of them fit together to make the whole square. This is an example of an area model of fractions. Another example is, one day is 1/7 of a week, because there are 7 days in a week and one hour is 1/24 of a day, because there are 24 hours in a day.
On the number line, unit fractions are given by distances that are part way from the origin to 1. So ½ marks the mid-point on the unit interval, since we begin from 0 to the midpoint, and measure ½ again, we will get to 1. Similarly, ⅓ is the leftmost of two points that divide the unit interval into 3 equal parts, since we begin from 0 to the point of ⅓, and ⅓ again, and ⅓ again, 3 times in all, we will get to 1.
We learned the easiest way to represent fractions is by area models. For an area model, we will use a rectangle to represent the whole. Then we can find 1/d of the rectangle by cutting the rectangle into d equal strips, either horizontal or vertical. Any one of the strips is equal to 1/d of the whole rectangle. If we use vertical strips, and take the base of the rectangle to be the unit length on a number line, then the area model can be thought of as a thickened version of the number line model. This is a very valuable connection between the two models, and can be used to transfer interpretations from one model to the other.
When discussing unit fractions, I will make sure that my students learn and know the fact, that for unit fractions of a fixed unit, the larger the denominator is, the smaller the unit fraction is. Then,
1/2 > 1/3 > 1/4 > 1/5 > 1/6
and so on, and forever. This is simple to see using either the area model or the linear model. Also, it makes sense: since two copies of ½ makes the whole, but two copies of 1/3 only makes 2/3, which is less than the whole, 1/3 must be less than ½.
Figure 1. 1/3 < 1/2
Once my students have a solid base with unit fractions, I will introduce general fractions as multiple copies of unit fractions. For example, 2/3 is 2 equivalent copies of 1/3, and ¾ is 3 equivalent copies of ¼, and so on. This is when fraction strip tiles are used so students are able to demonstrate the equivalent fraction examples.
In the area model, a general fraction can be represented by subdividing the rectangle into equal strips, with the number of strips equal to the denominator of the fraction, and then shading the number of strips specified by the numerator. The strips can be either horizontal or vertical. Here are examples of area models for the horizontal fractions ¾, 2/6, and 5/6.
The number line is an excellent way to represent all the multiples of a given unit fraction. After 1/d is placed on the number line, 2/d is at twice the distance from the origin as 1/d, and 3/d is at 3 times the distance, and so forth. This makes it very easy to show all the multiples of 1/d. It is a good model for making the point that fractions can be larger than 1. It also presents an attractive geometric picture: the multiples of a unit fraction give a subdivision of the number line that looks just like the subdivision given by whole numbers, except that it is finer. There are d intervals of length 1/d in each unit interval. The figures below show the multiples of ½ and of 1/3.
After students get an idea of what the multiples of a given unit fraction look like, we will discuss adding fractions with the same denominator, and multiplying a fraction by a whole number. The length model is excellent for studying these processes. Adding always corresponds to putting lengths end to end, and multiplying a length by a whole number corresponds to taking that number of the same length, and putting them all end to end.
By making strips equal to the lengths of the given fractions and putting them together end to end, I believe that my students will be able to see that the sum of two fractions with the same denominator is the fraction with the same denominator also, and with numerator equal to the sum of the two given numerators. For example,
3/2 + 5/2 = 8/2, and 1/3 + 4/3 = 5/3
It is nice to put bars representing the two fractions along the number line, and see that the addition is just like whole number addition, but with a smaller unit. The two additions just mentioned are illustrated below.
After extensive independent practices of general fractions as quantities, I want my students also to understand that a fraction can be thought of as the result of division, even though it is not defined that way. For example, although ¼ is defined as equal to what you get by dividing the unit into 4 equal pieces, ¾ is defined as 3 copies of ¼, not as what you get by dividing 3 into 4 equal pieces. However, the number line gives a good way to show that these two things are equal. This can be seen in figure below.
The interval from 0 to 3 is subdivided into 12 intervals of length 1/4, and then we can make 4 pieces consisting of 3 intervals of length ¼. Each of the 4 pieces has length ¾, and together they make the interval of length 3, so ¾ is ¼ of 3. That is, ¾ is 3 divided by 4. I will ask my students to give a similar explanation of some of other examples, such as 2/3 is 2 divided by 3, and 5/6 is 5 divided by 6.
We will also talk about comparing two fractions with the same denominator. This is very easy: the fraction with the larger numerator is larger. This can be easily seen by using both the area model and the number line model, although the number line model may be easier to use with fractions larger than 1.
When my students seem comfortable with fractions as quantities, and with the arithmetic of fractions with a fixed denominator, I will introduce the idea of renaming: that a given number can be represented by fractions with different denominators. This is also called fraction equivalence. I will use both area models and linear models to show this idea. Using a rectangle to represent the whole, we can divide it into 3 equal horizontal strips, and then we can also subdivide it into 4 equal vertical strips. The result will be that the whole is subdivided into 12 equal small rectangles. So each small rectangle represents 1/12 of the whole. But also, each horizontal strip, which is 1/3 of the whole, consists of 4 small rectangles, so it is also 4/12 of the whole. This means that 1/3 = 4/12. Looking at the vertical strips, we can reason in the same way to conclude that ¼ = 3/12. This means that both 1/3 and ¼ can be thought of as multiples of 1/12: 1/3 = 4/12, and ¼ = 3/12.
The renaming process can also be modeled on the number line. To do this in the case of ¼ and 1/3, subdivide the unit interval into 12 = 4×3 equal subintervals. Each of these has length 1/12. If we group the 1/12s into consecutive groups of 3, we get 4 equal pieces that fill up the unit interval, so 3/12 = ¼. If we form consecutive groups of 4 small subintervals, we will get 3 equal pieces that fill up the unit interval, so 4/12 = 1/3. This is the same example we gave earlier, when we said that 4 inches = 1/3 foot.
I will have my students look at many examples of this process, using both area models and linear models, until they are confident about two important conclusions:
i) Any fraction can be renamed to another fraction by multiplying both the numerator and the denominator by the same whole number. The renamed fraction represents the same number.
ii) Given two fractions, both can be renamed to fractions with the same denominator, which is the product of the two original denominators.
These facts make it easy to add fractions, to subtract fractions, and to compare fractions. Given two fractions, to add them, just rename both to have the same denominator, and then add the numerators. For example,
2/3+ 1/4 = 8/12 + 3/12 = 11/12
2/3 + 1/4 = (2x4)/(3x4) + (1x3)/(4x3) = 8/12 + 3/12 = 11/12.
The same strategy can be used to subtract fractions. As an example, here is a word problem related to Navajo rugs.
The Ganado pattern rug is 4 7/12 feet tall. The Two-Grey Hill rug is 3 ¾ feet tall. How much taller is the Ganado pattern then the Two Grey Hill?
We must find the difference 4 7/12 – 3 ¾. First, we can subtract the whole number parts: 4 – 3 = 1. So 4 7/12 – 3 ¾ = 1 7/12 – ¾. To subtract the ¾, we should find a common denominator for both fractions. We could use the method above, and take the product of the denominators. This would give us
1 (7×4)/(12×4) – (3×12)/(4×12) = 1 28/48 – 36/48.
To complete the calculation, we need to convert the 1 into 48/48. Then we get
1 28/48 – 36/48 = 48/48 + 28/48 – 36/48 = (48 + 28 -36)/48 = (76 – 36)/48 = 40/48.
Although the product of the denominators always gives a common denominator for two fractions, sometimes we can find a smaller common denominator. In this problem, it would be simpler if we use what we discussed above, that ¼ is equal to 3/12. Then we could calculate
1 7/12 – ¾ = 1 7/12 – 9/12 = 12/12 + 7/12 – 9/12 = (12 + 7 – 9)/12 = 10/12.
Since 10/12 = (10×4)/(12×4) = 40/48, the two answers we got are equivalent.
Still another way to solve this problem is to convert all the measurements into inches. Since 1 inch = 1/12 feet, we see that
4 7/12 feet = 4 feet, 7 inches, and 1 ¾ feet = 3 9/12 feet = 3 feet, 9 inches
1 7/12 feet – 3 ¾ feet = 4 feet, 7 inches – 3 feet, 9 inches = 1 foot, 7 inches – 9 inches = (12 inches + 7 inches) – 9 inches = 19 inches – 9 inches = 10 inches = 10/12 feet.
I will have my students solve problems like this in several different ways to help them see how the different strategies are connected.
To compare two fractions, rename them to have the same denominator, and then compare the numerators. For example, take 5/6 and 7/9. Rename
Then since 45 > 42, we know that 5/6 > 7/9. This can also be seen by representing both fractions on the same number line, and comparing the lengths.
After my students are comfortable with the renaming process and can add, subtract and compare fractions, I will have them study multiplication of fractions. The area model gives a good way to visualize this process. Here is the example of (2/3)×(2/5). Draw the rectangle representing the whole, and subdivide it into 5 equal horizontal strips, so that 2 of these strips is 2/5 of the whole. Then also subdivide the unit rectangle into 3 equal vertical strips. Each horizontal strip is also subdivided into 3 equal small rectangles. There are 15 of these small rectangles, so each one is 1/15 of the whole. Also, If we take the intersection of 2 vertical strips with the 2 horizontal strips making 2/5, we get 2/3 of these 2 strips, so we have 2/3 of 2/5, which is what we mean by (2/3)×(2/5). But we can also see that this region consists of 4 of the small rectangles. The conclusion is that
(2/3)×(2/5) = 4/15. I will have my students do examples of this process, until they can explain the general rule:
iii) To multiply two fractions, multiply their numerators, and multiply their denominators.
The example above, of the Ganado and Two Grey Hill rugs, shows that sometimes, when computing with fractions, you will end up with a larger denominator than you need. It is nice to have a denominator as small as possible, because fractions with small denominators are usually easier to interpret. For example, it is easier to think about ¾ than 51/68, although they represent the same number. For this reason, it is nice to know how to simplify a fraction, which means: rename it to a fraction with a smaller denominator.
Simplification is just fraction equivalence in reverse. Since we can check that
(3x17)/(4x17) = 51/68, we know that they represent the same number. But if we are just given 51/68, how can we know that it simplifies to ¾? The answer is that 17 is a common factor of 51 and 68: it divides both of them. Once we know that 17 divides both 51 and 68, we can divide to find 51 = 3x17 and 68 = 4x17, and then the rule for fraction equivalence, read in reverse, says that 51/68 = ¾. So to see if a fraction can be simplified, we should look for common divisors of the numerator and denominator. There is a systematic way to do this, but if the numerator and denominator are not too big, maybe the simplest approach is just to factor both of them into prime factors, and to see what factors they have in common. They can be divided by any common factor, and the resulting quotients will be the numerator and denominator of a fraction that expresses the same number as the original fraction.9
Here are some examples:
36/54 = (2x18)/(3x18) = 2/3. 12/20 = (3x4)/(5x4) = 3/5.
54/60 = (9x6)/(10x6) = 9/10. 35/42 = (5x7)/(6x7) = 5/6.
The rule to remember here is another version of the renaming rule.
when the numerator and denominator of a fraction have a common factor,
both the numerator and denominator can be divided by the factor,
without changing the value of the fraction.
Renaming and simplifying fractions helps with planning rugs. Suppose that a rug has 80 weft threads. Then a stripe of one color made from 10 weft threads is 10/80 of the whole rug. We sense it is easy to see that 10 divides both the numerator and denominator, we see that we can simplify 10/80 = 1/8. So we can plan to make 8 stripes of with a width of 10 weft threads. Renaming can also help the in the other direction. Suppose we want to make a stripe that is 2/5 of the length of the rug. Since 80 = 16x5, we can rename
2/5 = (2x16)/(5x16) = 32/80. This means that our stripe should be made of 32 weft threads.10
Problem solving fractions word problems requires a process in solving the problem. The acronym R. I. L. L. S. is a simple process I use in my classroom when solving math problems. R means to read the problem carefully. It means to imagine the problem in your mind and make a picture of what is happening and see what the question is asking you to do. L means to look for the facts within the problem, like the numbers and their relationship to each other. The second L means to look for the unknown to help you solve the problem. Unknowns like the clue words to help you decide which operation(s) you will need to solve the word problem. S means to solve the problem by writing it as a number sentence and answering the questions. Below are examples of fraction word problems for students.
The total length of two rugs is 10 feet. If one rug is 5 ⅞ feet, what is the length of the other rug?
5 ½ feet of a string of yarn is used to make a small loom and 2 ⅞ feet of string to make a stripe weave on the loom. How much more string is used to make the loom than the stripe design?
On the weekend students spend 6 3/5 hours weaving and 1 ¼ hours resting. How much less time did they spent resting then weaving?
The Ganado pattern rug is 4 7/12 feet tall. The Two-Grey Hill rug is 3 ¾ feet tall. How much taller is the Ganado pattern then the Two Grey Hill?
Three weaving combs measure 5 ¾ inches, 4 ½ inches, and 7 ⅔inches in length. What is the difference between the longest and shortest lengths of weaving combs?
Process of a Navajo loom and weaving a rug with basic stripes
Constructing the loom and weaving begins after the students have been taught lessons of fractions concepts. Students will have prior knowledge of fraction modeling, practice, and creating and solving fraction problems. Students using the loom concept came from a former Navajo culture and language teacher name, Ms. Diane Williams.11 I give credit and acknowledge to her idea. Students will need to know the parts of the loom and the tools for weaving. The warp is the string that stretches lengthwise on the loom. The weft is the different color yarns woven through the warps. The shed is the space created between cardboard and the string, which is lifted by the shed stick so the weft of yarn passes through this space. The selvage is the woven sides of the forming rug; students need to be cognizant of the selvage length in keeping an even width and length. The weaving comb is to push the weft close to the previously woven weft.
Students will begin the process of creating a loom to use for measuring fraction concepts. The loom will take one classroom session and the rest of the loom and weaving time will be conducted at home with parents assisting their child with the process. After the completion of their rug, students will return their rugs to the classroom. During math sessions students will create different fraction problems using their rug. They will begin with the rug as a whole 1, and next will begin distinguish the colored stripe and write the stripe as fraction strips. Measuring the stripes with common denominators is the simple part of addition. We begin with adding and subtracting fractions with like terms and then unlike terms with the stripes. We also will count the warp strings that make up the individual strands within the rug. Each warp is ⅛ of an inch wide. Another activity using the rug is to compare fraction and demonstrate equivalent fractions. This activity is conducted during the second week of the unit because the first week is whole class teaching, modeling and demonstrating to gain background knowledge and learning the components and processes of fractions and the number line. The second week is guided teaching, team tasks, and practice.
Process of a Navajo loom and weaving a rug with geometric designs
The third week of the unit is when students create another loom and rug with geometric designs. The geometric designs is a bit difficult because they will learn to weave shapes using the Dove Tail Stitch, which is weave the thread around the warp when another color left off. It forms a pattern of a triangle, a square, or circle and may take a longer time. Students may need to work on the weave on a weekend to complete the rug.
After the completion of the rug, they will begin the fraction concepts from their previous learning. Students will keep a portfolio of their work to show progress of learning. Learning fractions is reviewed of all wall charts created from the previous weeks which are displayed within the classroom.
Tools for students when constructing their looms and weaving the rugs. Various colors of yarn skeins for the wefts, sturdy cardboard boxes for the looms, Cotton spool for the warp, plastic needles, graph papers, color pencils,
Arizona Common Core College Career & Ready Standards for 5th grade in Mathematical Practice, Explanations, and Examples.
In fifth grade my curriculum unit will focus on numbers and operations standards of fraction. Students will demonstrate knowledge of using equivalent fractions as a strategy to add and subtract fraction (5.NF.a.1 & 2), apply and extend previous understanding of multiplication and division to multiply and divide fractions. (5.NF.B.3, 4, 5, 6 & 7)
Students apply their understanding of fractions and fraction models to represent the addition and subtraction of fractions with unlike denominators as equivalent calculations with like denominators. They develop fluency in calculating sums and differences of fractions, and make reasonable estimates of them. Students also use the meaning of fractions, of multiplication and division, and the relationship between multiplication and division to understand and explain why the procedures for multiplying and dividing fractions make sense. 12
We will focus on developing fluency with addition and subtraction of fractions, and developing understanding of the multiplication of fractions and of division of fractions and integrating decimal fractions into the cultural learning of Navajo weaving which includes the Navajo Culture Standards. The Dine Standard S3C.R2: PO 3. To exemplify general knowledge acquired on the traditional use of plants (e.g., for herbs, food, ointment, tools, and dwelling materials.13
Bibliography for Teachers
Bennet, Noel. & Bighorse, Tiana. Working with the Wool, How to Weave a Navajo Rug. 1971 Northland Press/Flagstaff
Blood, Charles and Link, Martin. The Goat in the Rug by Geraldine. First Aladdin Paperback Edition,1990
Miles, Miska. Annie and the Old One. Little, Brown and Company, 1971
Roessel, Monty. Songs from the Loom – A Navajo Girl Learns to Weave. Lerner Publications Company, 1995
- Roger Howe’s lecture
- Roger Howe’s lecture
- Roger Howe’s lecture
- Roger Howe’s lecture
- Roger Howe’s lecture
- Roger Howe’s lecture
- Concept Book produced by America’s Choice Educational Systems
- Understanding Numbers in Elementary School Mathematics by H. H. Wu, American Mathematical Society
- Grid, Scale, and Proportions
- Roger Howe’s lecture
- Williams, Diane. Cardboard loom and rug
- Dine Language and Culture Curriculum
THANK YOU — your feedback is very important to us! Give Feedback