- About the Initiative
- Curricular Resources
- On Common Ground
- League of Institutes
- Video Programs
Have a suggestion to improve this page?
To leave a general comment about our Web site, please click here
In the last twenty years, legal scholars have suggested that the power to interpret the Constitution might not rightly belong to the Supreme Court. Instead, they have argued that it may, in fact, belong to the People! In my unit, I will examine a third voice, that of Presidents, to explore two essential questions: Who should interpret the constitution and whose interpretation matters? In addition to addressing these questions, my unit provides an overview of the historical forces that account for the rise of judicial review. Instead of accepting judicial supremacy as a "fact," the unit challenges students to examine competing views and arguments for why the Supreme Court either should or shouldn't have the authoritative "say" on what the Constitution means.
Number 16 of the periodical On Common Ground
Fourteenth Annual Conference
Public School Teachers Complete Program at Yale
Search Curricular Resources written by teachers in National Seminars and Local Teachers Institute seminars.
View the Photo Gallery of Participants at Yale.
Explore the archive of News and Feature Stories.