Benefits of this Project:
It may be perceived this project is more art than science; however, the scientific understanding that goes into it generates the research we normally have to force students to do. This project allows students to combine their artistic skills with anatomical knowledge, encouraging creativity, research, and technical drawing abilities. A general theory of function concerning bodily organs, behaviors, customs, and both internal and external representations, asserting that the intentionality of language can be articulated independently of speaker intentions, and that the comprehension of thought's intentionality ought to be separated from the challenge of understanding consciousness.15 We also examine the strong correlation between genotype and morphological phenotype in numerous modern metazoans has fostered the prevailing belief that the evolution of organismal form directly results from the progression of genetic programming. Contrary to this perspective, we assert that the current link between genes and morphology is a highly evolved state, resulting from evolution rather than serving as its prerequisite.16 Before the biochemical canalization of developmental pathways and the stabilizing of phenotypes, the interaction of multicellular organisms with their physico-chemical surroundings established a many-to-many relationship between genes and forms. These structures would have been produced by epigenetic mechanisms: initially through physical processes typical of condensed, chemically reactive materials, and subsequently via conditional, inductive interactions among the organism's constituent tissues. The notion that epigenetic mechanisms serve as the catalysts for the emergence of morphological traits elucidates findings that are challenging to align with the conventional neo-Darwinian framework, such as the proliferation of body plans during the early Cambrian, the genesis of morphological innovation, homology, and swift alterations in form. Invented before the introduction of evolutionary theory, Linnaeus's system of classifying organisms is based on challenging theoretical assumptions and is thought to be unable to provide accurate biological classifications.17 Under guidance from the instructor as to practical matters it's interesting to see what students develop in their artistic interpretations.
Comments: